Sales-to-delivery handoffs
Review how commitments, customer details and deadlines move from an accepted proposal to the people delivering the work.
Let’s talk An AI process audit starts with the work your team does today. GenRev helps businesses across Ontario and beyond examine recurring effort, unclear handoffs and the information behind a process. Rather than beginning with a tool, we look at what happens, who owns it and where it gets stuck. The result is a clearer set of decisions: what to simplify, what to document and what may be suitable for automation.
Explore the approachChoose a process with a recognizable beginning and end. Recent examples, existing instructions and the people doing the work help explain how it actually runs. An AI process audit considers routine cases alongside delays and exceptions, because a neat process map can hide important differences. The recommendations should make dependencies and tradeoffs visible before implementation is discussed.
Trace the process from its initial trigger to completion, including owners, handoffs and decisions.
Identify repeated entry, waiting, unclear responsibility and steps that regularly need correction.
Review the inputs the process depends on, where they live and whether they are consistent enough to support a change.
Separate opportunities for process simplification, clearer instructions, rule-based automation and AI-assisted work.
Compare candidate improvements by likely usefulness, implementation effort, data readiness and operational requirements.
An AI process audit should leave you with decisions you can use. The agreed scope can include:
An AI process audit can examine these kinds of recurring work. They are illustrative starting points, not claims about completed client projects.
Review how commitments, customer details and deadlines move from an accepted proposal to the people delivering the work.
Examine how incoming documents are checked, categorized and entered into other systems to identify avoidable handling.
Compare several proposed workflows and choose a practical first project based on process clarity, available information and expected usefulness.
For an AI process audit, access to real examples matters more than a polished presentation. Identify which records and team members can explain the workflow.
An audit can cover one defined process or examine several connected workflows. Scope depends on the number of participants, the availability of records and how much observation is needed to understand normal work and exceptions. A focused review can use existing documentation; undocumented handoffs may need interviews and walkthroughs. Agree on which processes will be assessed, how recommendations will be prioritized and whether implementation planning extends beyond an initial roadmap.
NIST’s AI framework provides context for evaluating risks before choosing how AI should fit into a business process.
NIST guidance on AI risk managementStart with a description of the process, the people involved and the systems it uses. Existing instructions, sample forms and representative records can help explain the work. The review scope should establish which materials are needed and how they will be shared.
The audit is an assessment and recommendation phase. It defines opportunities and next steps. Any implementation should have its own agreed scope so you know what will be built and how it will be checked.
That is a useful finding. A simpler process, a clearer SOP or an ordinary software rule may address the problem more directly. The recommendation should follow the needs of the workflow.
Choose what to automate first by comparing recurring effort, process clarity, data readiness and error costs. Define a focused pilot before you build.
Understand AI automation costs and ROI: compare setup, subscriptions, review time and recovered capacity to build a practical business case for your team.
Learn how to document a process before automation. Define inputs, decisions, exceptions and ownership, then test your SOP with a worked lead-assignment example.